SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(P&H) 505

S.S.SODHI
Vijay Singh – Appellant
Versus
Haryana Roadways – Respondent


Judgment

1. Travelling on the roof of the bus, does it per se constitute contributory negligence on the part of such passengers if due to the negligence of the bus driver injury is caused to him? Here lies the significant point in issue in this appeal.

2. On June 30, 1983, the claimant- Vijay Singh boarded Haryana Roadways Bus HRF-5190 at Fatehabad on his way home at village Bhadolan Wali on the Fethehabad-Thedi-Hanspur Road. As the bus was full to capacity, the claimant got on the roof of the bus. When this bus reached near village Thedi, there were over-head electric wires hanging across the road. According to the claimant, he got entangled with one of these wires and was thrown off the bus as a result of which he sustained serious injuries. Compensation was asked for by him in respect of these injuries.

3. According to the respondents, that is, the bus-driver and the General Manager of the Haryana Roadways, the claimant had climbed on to the roof of the bus despite the express warning against it given to him by the driver and the conductor of the bus and he did not get down and come into the bus even at the next bus-stand when there were seats available inside the bus. Further, i











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top