PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
A.P.Chowdhri, J.
Ram Lubhaya
Versus
State Of Punjab
Criminal Appeal No. 41 of 1986,
Decided On : MAY 18, 1989
CRIMINAL LAW - SECTION 325/34 IPC - FACTUAL MATRIX - EYE-WITNESS TESTIMONY - RELIABILITY - SENTENCING - REDUCTION OF SENTENCE - DISCRETION OF THE COURT.
Fact of the Case:
The appellants, Ram Lubhaya and his mother Ratni, were convicted under Section 325/34 of the Indian Penal Code for causing the death of Swami, Ram Lubhaya's wife, due to rupture of the spleen. The prosecution alleged that the appellants had beaten Swami with a daatar and fists, causing her injuries. The appellants denied the allegations and claimed that they had been falsely implicated.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the testimony of the two eye-witnesses, Swami's brothers, was reliable and that it proved that the appellants had beaten Swami, causing her injuries. The court also found that the appellants had a history of estrangement with Swami and that they had objected to her brothers visiting her.
Issues: 1. Whether the testimony of the eye-witnesses was reliable. 2. Whether the appellants had beaten Swami, causing her injuries. 3. Whether the appellants had a history of estrangement with Swami. 4. Whether the appellants had objected to Swami's brothers visiting her.
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that the testimony of the eye-witnesses was reliable as it was consistent with the probabilities of the case and was not shaken in cross-examination. 2. The court held that the appellants had beaten Swami, causing her injuries, as the evidence of the eye-witnesses was corroborated by the medical evidence. 3. The court held that the appellants had a history of estrangement with Swami as it was admitted by the appellants in their cross-examination. 4. The court held that the appellants had objected to Swami's brothers visiting her as it was proved by the evidence of the eye-witnesses.
Final Decision: The court allowed the appeal to the extent that the sentence was reduced to one already undergone by the appellants.
A. P. Chowdhri, J.
1. Ram Lubhaya, 23 years. , and his mother Ratni, aged 60 years, were tried by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jalandhar, under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of Swami on Decem6er 20, 1984. As a result of the trial, the learned Additional Sessions Judge convicted both the appellants under Sec.325/34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced them to R. I. for four years and a fine of Rs.1000.00 each. In default of payment of fine, they were further sentenced to R. I. for six months. Aggrieved by the conviction and sentence, the accused have preferred this appeal.
2. The prosecution case against the appellants was that Swami was married to Ram Lubhaya 7-8 years back. ibe relations between the two spouses were strained and Ram Lubhaya appellant used to beat Swami. She went away to her brothers house, but due to intervention of Gurmit Ram Sarpanch she came back to her husbands house, 4-5 days prior to the occurrence. On December 20, 1984 Piara Ram and his brother Joginder Ram, who are real brothers of the deceased, came to see their sister. Swami started preparing meals for them. Her mother-in-law Ratni took objection to meals being served to Piara Ram and Joginder Ram on the ground that they had not behaved well with them. Ratni started giving danda blows to Swami hitting her on her face, buttocks and left ankle. Ram Lubhaya accused also joined in beating Swami hitting her on the head nose and right thigh with a daatar which he was carrying in his hand. Swami fell down on receipt of the injuries. Ratni appellant started giving fist blows on her abdomen. Piara Ram and Joginder Ram, who were sitting nearby, raised alarm on which the two appellants ran away with their weapons Joginder Ram brought a rickshaw and removed their injured sister Swami to the Civil Hospital. Some time was consumed on the way as the level crossing was closed. The reached the hospital at about 8.15 p. m. Swami died at 9.15 p. m. the same day.
3. The doctor In charge of the hospital informed the police. The police came to the hospital, recorded statement Exhibit P. G. of Piara Ram on the basis of which formal First Information Report Exhibit PG/2 was entered. Inquest report was prepared and the body was subjected to postmortem examination. Ram Lubhaya accused was arrested on 25-12-1984 and blood-strained daatar Ex. P.1 was recovered in pursuance of his statement. As a result of the postmortem examination, it was found that Swami had an enlarged spleen almost thrice the normal size and she had died on account of rupture of the spleen.
4. At the trial, prosecution examined both the eye-witnesses i. e. Piara Ram, P. W.5, and Joginder Ram P. W.6, besides the doctor, Investigating Officer and formal witnesses. Darshan Singh, a neighbour of the appellant Ram Lubhaya, who was also named as having witnessed the occurrence, was given up as having been won over. Ram Lubhaya stated that he had strained relationship which his brother-in-law Piara Ram and had asked him not to visit his house. He denied having had strained relations with his wife. In those days when the occurrence took place, he was wroking at Ludhiana and used to commute between his residence at Phillaur and Ludhiana daily. On the day of occurrence when he returned from his duty he found his wife lying in an injured condition. He removed her to the hospital and also sent a messenger to his in-laws. He had been falsely implicated in the case at the instance of his in laws. Ratni denied her presence at the place of occurrence. The learned Trial Court held that it was proved that Swami was maltreated by her in laws for various reasons.
5. The contention of learned Counsel for the appellants is that the Trial Court had fallen in error in relying on the testimony of Piara Ram, P. W.5, and Joginder Ram, P. W.6. They were both real brothers of Swami deceased. They belong to village Garba which is 2 1/2 -3 Kms. from the place of occurrence. Piara Ram, P. W.5
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.