S.S.SODHI, G.C.MITTAL
Pearl Woollen Mills – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Income-tax – Respondent
Gokal Chand Mital, J.
1. The assessee-firm was assessed as an unregistered firm for the assessment year 1971-72. Unabsorbed depreciation of over a lakh of rupees remained after the aforesaid assessment. For the assessment year 1972-73, the assessee-firm was registered. When the case relating to the assessment year 1973-74 was taken up, the assessee wanted to set off the unabsorbed depreciation relating to the assessment year 1971-72 from the firms income also but that was declined upto the Tribunal in view of the decisions of the Delhi, Allahabad and Gujarat High Courts. At the instance of the assessee, the following question has been referred for opinion :
"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and on a proper construction of Section 32(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the Tribunal is correct in holding that the depreciation allowance for the assessment year 1973-74 of the assessee, a registered firm, would not include the unabsorbed depreciation allowance for the assessment year 1971-72 and, therefore, the assessee is not entitled to the aggregate of the depreciation allowances for the assessment years 1971-72 and 1973-74 to be set off against the inco
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.