SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(P&H) 89

S.S.SODHI, G.C.MITTAL
Pearl Woollen Mills – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Income-tax – Respondent


Judgment

Gokal Chand Mital, J.

1. The assessee-firm was assessed as an unregistered firm for the assessment year 1971-72. Unabsorbed depreciation of over a lakh of rupees remained after the aforesaid assessment. For the assessment year 1972-73, the assessee-firm was registered. When the case relating to the assessment year 1973-74 was taken up, the assessee wanted to set off the unabsorbed depreciation relating to the assessment year 1971-72 from the firms income also but that was declined upto the Tribunal in view of the decisions of the Delhi, Allahabad and Gujarat High Courts. At the instance of the assessee, the following question has been referred for opinion :

"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and on a proper construction of Section 32(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the Tribunal is correct in holding that the depreciation allowance for the assessment year 1973-74 of the assessee, a registered firm, would not include the unabsorbed depreciation allowance for the assessment year 1971-72 and, therefore, the assessee is not entitled to the aggregate of the depreciation allowances for the assessment years 1971-72 and 1973-74 to be set off against the inco







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top