SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(P&H) 668

G.R.MAJITHIA
Surjit Singh – Appellant
Versus
Santosh Kumari – Respondent


Judgment

G.R.Majithia, J.

1. This appeal is directed against the award dated January 28, 1984, of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Ambala.

2. Respondent No. 1 and her two sons filed an application under Section 110 A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 , against the appellants and respondent No. 3. The deceased, husband of Santosh Kumari and the father of the two minor sons, was working as a salesman in the Sadhaura Marketing Co-operative-cum-Processing Society Limited, Sadhaura. Appellant No. 1 was arrayed as respondent No. 1 in the petition. He is working as a sub-inspector attached to the office of the Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Naraingarh. On the date of filing of the application, he was posted at Sha-, zadpur, Tehsil Naraingarh, District Ambala. Both Sadhaura and Shazadpur fall in Tehsil Naraingarh, District Ambala, while villages Bhogpur and Bas-satianwala fall in Tehsil Jagadhri, District Ambala. On April 2, 1981, after the close of the office, appellant No. 1 happened to meet the deceased in Sadhaura and offered him a lift on his motor cycle since as he was going to his village, Bassatianwala, he could drop him at village Bhogpur on his way. The deceased us



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top