SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(P&H) 598

G.C.MITTAL, S.S.SODHI
Commissioner Of Income-tax – Appellant
Versus
Oswal Woollen Mills Ltd. – Respondent


Judgment

S.S.Sodhi, J.

1. The matter here concerns surtax for the assessment years 1973-74, 1974-75 and 1975-76.

2. The assessee-company, Oswal Woollen Mills Limited, was assessed to surtax for the three assessment years in question. In order to work out the profits chargeable to surtax, the capital of the assessee-company had to be computed as per the Second Schedule to the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act and the interpretation of Rule 4 of that Schedule with reference to the relief allowed under Section 80J of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred as "the Act"). The Income-tax Officer came to the conclusion that proportionate deduction in the capital under Rule 4 on account of the deductions allowed under Sections 80J and 80G of the Act, was warranted and he accordingly reduced the capital computed for the three assessment years in question for the purpose of working out the standard deduction at the rate of 10 per cent. of the amount of capital computed. The Income-tax Officer, however, negatived the assessees contention on the point and held that when a sum was deducted from the total income, it did not find place in the total income when it was computed and in view ther




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top