SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(P&H) 530

D.V.SEHGAL
Pushpmala Jain – Appellant
Versus
Bank Of Baroda – Respondent


Judgment

1. This revision petition is directed against the order dt.16-5-1987 passed by the learned Senior Sub Judge, Rohtak, in the course of execution of a decree dt.5-1-1983 passed by the trial Court, which was affirmed in appeal by the learned District Judge on 23-7-1984. The execution of the said decree was sought by the Bank of Baroda respondent I claiming a sum of Rs. 10,91,280.00 from the judgment debtors. It is not in dispute that during the pendency of the suit, the property of the objector-petitioner was attached before judgment by the trial Court in the year 1979.

2. The petitioner filed the instant objection petition during the pendency - of the execution proceedings in the year 1984 claiming that the property in dispute is a residential house situated in Sarai Mohalla, Rohtak, She and her sons are putting up their residence in the said house. She is a widow having no other source of income. She, therefore, claimed that the property being a residential house was exempt from attachment. This objection petition has, however, been dismissed by the learned Executing Court vide the impugned order.

3. It is not in dispute that the evidence on the record clearly brings out tha






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top