PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Ujagar Singh, J.
Mansa Ram
Versus
State Of Punjab
Criminal Writ Petition No. 524 of 1988,
Decided On : AUGUST 26, 1988
Furlough - Prisoner's Entitlement - Interpretation of Punjab Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1962
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, sentenced to life imprisonment, sought release on furlough based on his remissions earned and the recommendation of the Superintendent Jail. The District Magistrate rejected the furlough based on a police report, which the petitioner argued was irrelevant to his case.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the police report was not a valid ground to reject the furlough application, emphasizing the entitlement of the petitioner to furlough as per the Punjab Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1962.
Issues: The key issue was the validity of the rejection of the furlough application based on a police report and the interpretation of the entitlement to furlough under the Punjab Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1962.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the Superintendent Jail's recommendation and the petitioner's entitlement to furlough as per the Punjab Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1962 should be the primary considerations, and the police report should not be the sole basis for rejecting the furlough application.
Final Decision: The petitioner was granted bail to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hissar, with a directive to surrender after enjoying complete 21 days furlough.
Ujagar Singh, J.
1. The petitioner was sentenced to life imprisonment on 15th January, 1983, after he was arrested on 21st March, 1981. Thus, he has undergone much more than three years. The total remissions earned by him come to three years, three months and I days up to 22nd March, 1988.
2. The only objection to his prayer for release on furlough can be that an amount of Rs. 130/- was recovered from his possession but according to the petitioner it was not proved nor was there any compliance under Judicial appraisal, and nor was he sentenced to any jail punishment under the Punjab Jail Manual or the Prisons Act and the Punjab Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1962 . The Superintendent Jail (respondent No. 3) recommended his case for furlough on 11th March, 1987, and it was sent to the District Magistrate, Hissar, who is said to have rejected it on the basis of the police report. As a matter of fact, after the petitioner was arrested he remained in custody, in judicial lock-up, and thereafter in Central Jail, and for this period, therefore, the police had nothing to do with the petitioner. The Superintendent Jail is the best person to watch his conduct and give a certificate and in that view recommend his case for furlough. The report of the police for this purpose will be irrelevant. To base the order on the furlough application on the police report is not a good ground to reject the petition. According to section 4 of the Punjab Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1962 the petitioner becomes entitled to furlough for a period of three weeks commencing from the day immediately following the date of his release.
3. Bail to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hissar. The petitioner is directed to surrender on 22nd day after enjoying complete 21 days furlough.
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.