SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(P&H) 365

UJAGAR SINGH
Mansa Ram – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Judgment

Ujagar Singh, J.

1. The petitioner was sentenced to life imprisonment on 15th January, 1983, after he was arrested on 21st March, 1981. Thus, he has undergone much more than three years. The total remissions earned by him come to three years, three months and I days up to 22nd March, 1988.

2. The only objection to his prayer for release on furlough can be that an amount of Rs. 130/- was recovered from his possession but according to the petitioner it was not proved nor was there any compliance under Judicial appraisal, and nor was he sentenced to any jail punishment under the Punjab Jail Manual or the Prisons Act and the Punjab Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1962 . The Superintendent Jail (respondent No. 3) recommended his case for furlough on 11th March, 1987, and it was sent to the District Magistrate, Hissar, who is said to have rejected it on the basis of the police report. As a matter of fact, after the petitioner was arrested he remained in custody, in judicial lock-up, and thereafter in Central Jail, and for this period, therefore, the police had nothing to do with the petitioner. The Superintendent Jail is the best person to watch his conduct and gi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top