SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(P&H) 299

V.RAMASWAMI, G.R.MAJITHIA
Joginder Singh – Appellant
Versus
Director, Consolidation Of Holdings, Punjab, Chandigarh – Respondent


Judgment

G.R.MAJITHIA, J.

1. The writ petitioners have challenged the order of the Director of Consolidation of Holdings Punjab passed under Sec.42 of the East Punjab Holding (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948 (for short, hereinafter referred to as the Act) in this petition.

2. The brief facts as unfolded in the writ petition are these. The petitioners are in possession of different parcels of land under the Gram Panchayat (respondent 2). The land was described as Shamlat deh in the revenue record and owned by the Gram Panchayat. It was mutated in the name of the Gram Panchayat in the year 1956-57 under the provisions of Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Village Common Lands Act).

3. The right holders of the village, including respondents 3 to 6, preferred a petition under Sec.42 of the Act before the Director of Consolidation of Holdings, Punjab, in Aug. 1985, contending that the land in dispute was Banjar Qadim and according to the entry in the Wajib-ul-Arz of the village it had to be apportioned among the proprietors and Khewatdars of the village prorate of their holdings in the revenue estate, that the Direc













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top