SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(P&H) 205

G.C.MITTAL, S.D.BAJAJ
Narinderpal Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Judgment

GOKAL CHAND MITAL, J.

1. Whether the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, (for short the Tribunal ), has the jurisdiction to determine the percentage of liability, in other words to apportion the liability of the tortfeasors inter se when in law their liability towards the claimants is joint and several, is the question posed in this appeal. The Motion Bench while admitting the appeal had entertained doubts on the correctness of the decision of M.M. Punchhi, J. in Mukhtiar Singh V/s. Smt. Krishna Gulati, 1986 (1) 89 Pun LR 600 and thus had ordered the appeal to the heard by a Division Bench. This is how this appeal is before us. Before we proceed to consider the law point, it would be necessary to state the brief facts.

2. On 24-7-1984 Narinderpal Singh claimant along with his brother Surinderpal Singh was travelling by Bus No. PUR 4401 owned by the Punjab Roadways. He was occupying the seat on the right side of the bus near the glass window. At about 6.45 p.m. when the bus reached near village Sarhana on Morinda Chamkaur Sahib road, a truck No. PUR 5985 coming from Morinda side collided against the bus. The truck was being driven by Hazara Singh respondent 5 and the bus by Pre































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top