V.RAMASWAMI, J.

1. This writ petition has been referred to for consideration by a Full Bench on the ground that there are two conflicting Division Bench judgements reported in Suresh Chand V/s. Director of Panchayat, Haryana, 1979 Pun LT 116 and Ram Saroop V/s. Director of Panchayat, Haryana, 1983 Pun LJ 350 on the question whether a complainant is to be afforded an opportunity of hearing before revoking an order of suspension made under Sec.102 of the Punjab Gram Panchayat Act, 1953 (the Act in short), as applicable to the State of Haryana. Before we go into the real question that has been referred to, we may notice a few facts which relate to the filing of the writ petition.

2. The third respondent Mukh Ram is Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat, Kail, P.O. Jagadhri, District Ambala. On the ground that he has occupied unauthorisedly Gram Panchayat land, the petitioner made a complaint to the Director of Panchayats, Haryana, against the Sarpanch : A preliminary enquiry was conducted by the Deputy Director Panchayats, Haryana and in his preliminary report dated July 15, 1985, he held that there were prima facie grounds for holding the Sarpanch guilty of some of the allegatio