SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(P&H) 82

UJAGAR SINGH
Parminder Singh – Appellant
Versus
Senior Superintendent Of Police – Respondent


JudgmentJudgment

Ujagar Singh, J.

1. This petition seeks quashing of the history-sheet of the petitioner opened by the respondents and for issuance of a direction to destroy the history-sheet, finger-prints, foot-prints and photographs illegally taken and kept on the record of Police Station, Samrala.

2. The grounds alleged in the petition are that the petitioner Parminder Singh is a young man of about 39 years and has studied up to Pre-University; that he is a wine contractor and also owns huge rural and urban property and is a respectable citizen; that the opponents of the petitioner got false cases registered against him at Police Station, Samrala and other police stations but he was acquitted in all the cases and was never convicted by any court for any criminal charge. It is alleged that the respondents have illegally entered the name of the petitioner in the history-sheet vide Register No. 10 of Police Station Samrala apart from having taken his finger-prints, foot-prints and photographs.

3. Rule 23.4(3) of the Punjab Police Rules, 1934 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules) reads as under :-

"23.4 Surveillance Register No. X. (1) x x x

(2) x x x

(3) In part II of such registe





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top