SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(P&H) 56

G.C.MITTAL
Ram Sarup (Deceased By Lrs) – Appellant
Versus
Lal Chand – Respondent


JudgmentJudgment

1. Ejectment petition was filed against the tenant on the ground that he had sub-let the premises to his son. The tenant died when the proceedings were pending before the Rent Controller and the son of the tenant continued the proceedings as the next heir on the plea that he had inherited the tenancy. The Rent Controller passed order of eviction against the son of the tenant on the reasoning that sub-letting to son had been established and, therefore, even if the subtenant had become the tenant later on, it did not matter. The alleged sub-tenant, who became the tenant in view of the death of the tenant, went up in appeal and the Appellate Authority held that in view of the Supreme Court judgment in Gian Devi V/s. Jiwan Kumar, AIR 1985 SC 796, the tenant was heritable, therefore, the son of the tenant, who was alleged to be the sub-tenant, became a direct tenant. Since he became a direct tenant, it was held that he could not be evicted from the premises. As a result he allowed the appeal and set aside the order of eviction passed by the Rent Controller. This is landlord s revision.

2. Shri R.L. Sarin vehemently contends that once a ground of eviction is established i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top