SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(P&H) 16

TEK CHAND
Chiranji Lal Multani R. B. (Private) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India Through Secy. Dept. Of Food Ministry Of Food And Agri. , New Delhi – Respondent


Judgment

Tek Chand, J.

1. This first appeal from order has been preferred under Section 39 of the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 , from the Court of Subordinate Judge 1st Class, Delhi, holding that there was an arbitration agreement between the parties and that the suit instituted by the plaintiff-appellant was liable to be stayed under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.

2. It is necessary to state the facts giving rise to the dispute in their entirety. The plaintiff-appellant is a Private Limited Company and was required to supply a certain quantity of Gram whole. The plaintiff is a registered Company. It was invited to submit a tender. The conditions are contained in Mamo. C/200, dated the 31st of December, 1955. It was stated in paragraph 2 of this document that the supplies of Barley/Gram whole will be governed by the terms and conditions as stipulated in the office Memo No. C/900, dated the 24th February, 1949, as amended to date, and special conditions stipulated hereunder, that is, Exhibit D-7, The invitation was signed as under:

"B. R. Dhawan, Assistant Director of Purchase, for and on behalf of the President of India."

It is provided in Memo No. C/900, dated the 24th of Febru
















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top