SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(P&H) 31

S.S.DULAT, I.D.DUA
Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Punjab – Appellant
Versus
Lakshmi Ratten Engineering Works, Ltd. – Respondent


Judgment

Dulat, J.

1. In March, 1952, Parliament enacted the Employees Provident Funds Act (19 of 1952) in order to, as the preamble says, provide for the institution of provident funds for employees in factories and other establishments. The Act was made applicable to every factory engaged in any industry specified in Schedule I in which 50 ore more persons were employed. A "factory" was defined in the Act as.

"any premises including the precincts thereof in any part of which a manufacturing process is being carried on or is ordinarily so carried on, whether with the aid to power or without the aid of power".

and an "employee" was defined as

"any person who is employed for wages in any kind of work, manual or otherwise, in or in connection with the work of a factory".

Certain exceptions were, however, provided for in the Act, and for that the Central Government was given power to exempt certain factories in certain circumstances. At the same time, power was given to the Central Government to add to the industries mentioned in Schedule I. Section 5 of the Act empowered the Central Government to "frame a scheme for the establishment of provident funds under the Act for employees or a


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top