I.D.DUA, D.K.MAHAJAN
Sukhdip Singh – Appellant
Versus
Arjan Singh Mihan Singh – Respondent
1. The facts which have given rise to this appeal may be stated in a nutshell. Arjan Singh and his brother Surjan Singh were owners in possession of land, the particulars of which are con tained in the judgment of the Court of first instance. After consolidation in village Mehargarh Batti Estate, 322 tehsil Patiala, khasra Nos. 92 and 99 measuring 50 bighas and 4 biswas were allotted in village Mehargarh Batti and the share of Arjan Singh, plaintiff, in this land was one-half, the other half being the share of Surjan Singh, his brother, Similarly, Arjan Singh, plaintiff, and his brother Surjan Singh owned land in equal shares measuring about 110 bighas and I biswa situated in village Karanpur Estate 323, tehsil Patiala. After consolidation of holdings, in lieu of this land, khasra Nos. 46, 2, 37 and 63 were allotted in village Karanpur.
2. Arjan Singh, plaintiffs case as alleged is that his brother Surjan Singh died issueless sometime in 1999 Bk. without leaving any other heir except the plaintiff, who came to occupy his brothers share as well immediately after the tatters death. He has thus been enjoying the property in dispute without any interruption or interference for
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.