SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(P&H) 19

I.D.DUA, D.K.MAHAJAN
Sukhdip Singh – Appellant
Versus
Arjan Singh Mihan Singh – Respondent


Judgment

1. The facts which have given rise to this appeal may be stated in a nutshell. Arjan Singh and his brother Surjan Singh were owners in possession of land, the particulars of which are con tained in the judgment of the Court of first instance. After consolidation in village Mehargarh Batti Estate, 322 tehsil Patiala, khasra Nos. 92 and 99 measuring 50 bighas and 4 biswas were allotted in village Mehargarh Batti and the share of Arjan Singh, plaintiff, in this land was one-half, the other half being the share of Surjan Singh, his brother, Similarly, Arjan Singh, plaintiff, and his brother Surjan Singh owned land in equal shares measuring about 110 bighas and I biswa situated in village Karanpur Estate 323, tehsil Patiala. After consolidation of holdings, in lieu of this land, khasra Nos. 46, 2, 37 and 63 were allotted in village Karanpur.

2. Arjan Singh, plaintiffs case as alleged is that his brother Surjan Singh died issueless sometime in 1999 Bk. without leaving any other heir except the plaintiff, who came to occupy his brothers share as well immediately after the tatters death. He has thus been enjoying the property in dispute without any interruption or interference for
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top