SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(P&H) 204

I.D.DUA, P.C.PANDIT
Gulzara Singh Nanta Singh – Appellant
Versus
Tej Kaur – Respondent


Judgment

I.D.Dua, J.

1. In order to understand the precise dispute, it is desirable to set out the pedigree-table of the parties:

LEHNA SINGH

__________________|_______________

| |

Santa Singh Nanta Singh

| ___________|__________

Ind Kaur, | |

his widow, who Gulzara (Tej Kaur,

contracted karewa Singh his widow). Gulzara

with Nanta Singh his son. Singh was born from

the loins of Nanta

Singh and the womb

of Ind Kaur.

2 Nanta Singh died on the 16th September 1955 and on his death Gulzara Singh defendant got the entire land belonging to the deceased mutated in his own name. The plaintiff claiming to be entitled to half the property left by Nanta Singh, instituted the present suit for possession of half share of the land and the houses in dispute. She furthe





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top