SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(P&H) 148

D.K.MAHAJAN, G.D.KHOSLA
Commissioner Of Income-tax, Punjab, Jammu & Kashmir And Himachal Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
Jai Parkash Co. Ltd. – Respondent


Judgment

MAHAJAN, J.

1. This is an application under section 66 (2) of the Income-tax Act by the Commissioner of Income-tax asking this court to issue a mandamus to the Income-tax Tribunal directing it to state the following question of law for the decision of this court :

"Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the sum of Rs. 94,253 or any part of it accrued or arose or could be deemed to accrue or arise or was received or could be deemed to be received by the assessee as income, profits and gains during the previous year."

2. The facts of this case are not in dispute. The assessee company entered into a contract for forward sale of 79 teeps of mustard on February 5, 1952, with a private chamber of commerce, namely, the Bharat Co. Ltd. at the rate of Rs. 27-8-0 per maund. The due date was June 7, 1952. On February 28, 1952, the assessee company sent a telegram to the chamber to the effect that if the chamber did not inform it within four hours of the receipt of the telegram about the acceptance of the settlement of the bargain at the rate of Rs. 16-14-6 per maund, it would presume that the chamber had accepted the settlement of the assessees outstanding bargain a
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top