SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(P&H) 46

D.K.MAHAJAN
Gurdit Singh Natha Singh – Appellant
Versus
Employees State Insurance Corporation – Respondent


Judgment

D.K.Mahajan, J.

1. This is an appeal under Section 82 of the Employees State Insurance Act (No. 39 of 1948) against the order of Sub-divisional Magistrate, Batala, dated the 9th of July, 1959, refusing to recognize the parents as the dependants under the Act after the remarriage of the widow of the deceased.

2. Boota Singh was working in the Sardar Foundary Works at Batala. On the date when he died he was working on the grinding machine, when he met with a fatal accident. At the date of his death, he left a widow, Amarjit Kaur, and his aged parents. The widow remarried on the 25th of March, 1958. It seems, she never claimed dependants benefit under the Act. The present application was made by the aged parents. This application was opposed by the Corporation on the ground that Boota Singh had left a widow and therefore the parents were not entitled to the dependants benefit. This objection of the Corporation prevailed with the insurance Court and their claim was rejected. Dissatisfied with this, as I have already said, the parents have come up to this Court in appeal.

3. The contention of Mr. Tewari, learned counsel for the appellant, is that as the widow has remarried, ther

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top