SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(P&H) 236

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
G.D.Khosla and Tek Chand JJ.
Jarnial Singh Harjit Singh
Versus
Bakshi Singh Sham Singh
Letter Patent Appeal No. 132 of 1958,
Decided On : DECEMBER 24, 1959

One out of several joint-holders can be deemed to be a shareholder and a member of a private company within the meaning of Article 8(a) of the Articles of Association and Section 2(1)(13) of the Indian Companies Act, 1913.

Headnote:

COMPANY LAW - PRIVATE COMPANY - TRANSFER OF SHARES - JOINT-HOLDERS - WHETHER ONE OUT OF SEVERAL JOINT-HOLDERS CAN BE DEEMED TO BE A SHAREHOLDER AND A MEMBER OF THE COMPANY WITHIN THE MEANING OF ARTICLE 8(A) OF THE ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION - INTERPRETATION OF ARTICLE 8(A) AND SECTION 2(1)(13) OF THE INDIAN COMPANIES ACT, 1913.

Fact of the Case:

The plaintiff, a shareholder in a private company, challenged the transfer of shares made in favor of two defendants, Jarnail Singh and Behari Lal, on the ground that the transfers were illegal and ultra vires of the Articles of Association of the company. The trial court and the lower appellate court upheld the plaintiff's claim and granted a declaratory decree in his favor. The defendants appealed to the High Court.

Finding of the Court:

The High Court allowed the appeal and dismissed the plaintiff's suit. The court held that one out of several joint-holders can be deemed to be a shareholder and a member of the company within the meaning of Article 8(a) of the Articles of Association. The court interpreted Article 8(a) and Section 2(1)(13) of the Indian Companies Act, 1913, and concluded that the transfers of shares to the defendants were not tainted with any illegality.

Issues: 1. Whether one out of several joint-holders can be deemed to be a shareholder and a member of the company within the meaning of Article 8(a) of the Articles of Association? 2. Whether the transfers of shares to the defendants were illegal and ultra vires of the Articles of Association of the company?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court interpreted Article 8(a) of the Articles of Association and Section 2(1)(13) of the Indian Companies Act, 1913, and held that the proviso to Section 2(1)(13) does not mean that two or more persons holding shares jointly are to be treated as a single member for all purposes. It only means that they are to be treated as a single member for the purpose of the definition of a private company. 2. The court held that Article 8(a) of the Articles of Association does not exclude the transferee from being a shareholder of the company when his name, along with that of another, is borne on the register of members of the company. The court further held that placing a narrow construction on this article, as is contended for by the respondent, will be putting an unreasonable restraint upon the alienation of property.

Final Decision: The High Court allowed the appeal and dismissed the plaintiff's suit.

Judgment

Tek Chand, J.

1. This is a Letters Patent appeal from the judgment of Grover J. dismissing regular second appeal preferred by two defendants-appellants, Jarnail Singh and Behari Lal. In this case the trial Court, whose judgment was affirmed by the learned Single Judge, had passed a decree in plaintiffs favour for a declaration that transfers of shares made in favour of Jarnali Singh and Behari Lal defendants Nos. 11 and 12 were illegal and ultra vires of the Articles of Association of the Moga Transport Company (Private) Ltd. Jarnail Singh and Behari Lal had unsuccessfully appealed to the Senior Subordinate Judge, Ferozepur, and their appeal to the High Court was also dismissed by the learned Single Judge. This is an appeal on their behalf under the Letters Patent of this Court.

2. On 26-5-1954, the Company had sanctioned the transfer of ten shares held by Bachittar Singh in favour of Jarnail Singh defendant No. 11, and had also sanctioned transfer of five shares held by Milkhi Ram in favour of Behari Lal defendant No. 12. These transfers besides some other transfers which are no longer the subject-matter of any dispute were challenged by the plaintiff and a relief by way of declaratory decree was prayed, which has been granted. On the parties pleadings, the following four issues were framed, but at this stage we are concerned with the first issue in so far as it affects the case of the contesting defendants Nos. 11 and 12:

1. Whether the transfer of shares in favour of defendants 2 to 12 is illegal and ultra vires for the reasons given in Paras 5 to 7 of the plaint, if so, its effect?

2. Is the suit within time?

3. Whether the plaintiff is estopped by his conduct from suing?

4. Relief?

3. On the register of members of this Company, there are two sets of joint shareholders, (1) Karnail Singh and Jarnail Singh. (2) Girdhari Lal and Behari Lal. The two transfers sanctioned by the Company on 26-5-1954, were in favour of Jarnail Singh and Behari Lal respectively each in their individual capacity. The contention raised on behalf of the plaintiff and which found favour with the learned Single Judge and the two Courts below was that although Jarnail Singh and Karnail Singh as two joint holders, and similarly Behari Lal and Girdhari Lal as two joint holders, were members of the Company but a single joint holders cannot be deemed to be a shareholder and a member of the Company within the meaning of Article 8(a) of the Articles of Association of the Company. For ready reference, the relevant articles of the Articles of Association of the Company are reproduced below:

"Article 2. The Company is a private Company within the meaning of Section 2 (1)(13) of the Indian Companies Act, 1913 , and accordingly (1) no invitation shall be issued to the public to subscribe for any share, debentures or debenture stock of the Company (2) the number of the members of the Company (exclusive of persons in the employment of the Company) shall be limited to fifty, provided that for the purposes of this provision, where two or more persons hold one or more shares, in the Company jointly they shall be treated as single member and (3) the right to transfer the shares of the Company is restricted in manner and to the extent hereinafter appearing.

Article 8 (a). No shareholder will be entitled to transfer his shares except to other shareholders of this Company.

Article 11. Each shareholder and director will have only one vote irrespective of the number of shares he holds.

Article 12. The qualification of a director shall be holding in his own right and not jointly with any other person one or more shares of the Company."

4. The only question that has to be examined is whether having regard to the constitution of the Company, which is a private Company within the meaning of Section 2(1)(13) of the Indian Companies Act 1913, sanction to transfer of shares by a shareholder in favour of one out of several joint-holders is in contravention of article 8(a) o
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top