SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(P&H) 122

A.N.BHANDARI, S.S.DULAT
Indian Iron And Steel Company Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Officer On Special Duty (Central Circle) – Respondent


Judgment

A.N.Bhandari, J.

1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution raises the question whether the Excise and Taxation Officer was justified in requiring the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs. 1,59,762-12-0 by way of sales tax.

2. The petitioner in the present case is the Indian Iron and Steel Company, Limited, which has its head office at Calcutta and two branches known as Burnpur Works and Kulti Works.

3. On the 7th January, 1954, the petitioner applied to the Excise and Taxation Officer, Ambala, for registration under the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 , without prejudice to its contention that it did not carry on any business in the Punjab and was not a dealer within the meaning of the said Act. A registration certificate was issued to him in due course.

4. On the 25th August, 1956, the Assessing Authority, Punjab, came to the conclusion that the taxable turnover of the petitioner for the year 1953-54 was Rs. 51, 12,408 and that the sales tax payable by the petitioner was Rs. 1,59,762-12-0. The petitioner presented an application before the Deputy Excise and Taxation Commissioner, Jullundur, for permission to prefer an appeal against the order of assessment without















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top