A.N.BHANDARI, S.S.DULAT
Indian Iron And Steel Company Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Officer On Special Duty (Central Circle) – Respondent
A.N.Bhandari, J.
1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution raises the question whether the Excise and Taxation Officer was justified in requiring the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs. 1,59,762-12-0 by way of sales tax.
2. The petitioner in the present case is the Indian Iron and Steel Company, Limited, which has its head office at Calcutta and two branches known as Burnpur Works and Kulti Works.
3. On the 7th January, 1954, the petitioner applied to the Excise and Taxation Officer, Ambala, for registration under the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 , without prejudice to its contention that it did not carry on any business in the Punjab and was not a dealer within the meaning of the said Act. A registration certificate was issued to him in due course.
4. On the 25th August, 1956, the Assessing Authority, Punjab, came to the conclusion that the taxable turnover of the petitioner for the year 1953-54 was Rs. 51, 12,408 and that the sales tax payable by the petitioner was Rs. 1,59,762-12-0. The petitioner presented an application before the Deputy Excise and Taxation Commissioner, Jullundur, for permission to prefer an appeal against the order of assessment without
Kandhari Oil Mills, Jullundur, And Ors. V/s. Excise And Taxation Commissioner, Pnnjab And Anr.
Lala Lachhman Das Nayar (H.U.F.) And Ors.
Bengal Immunity Company Limited V/s. The State Of Bihar And Ors.
Himmatlal Harilal Mehta V/s. The State Of Madhya Pradesh And Ors.
State Of Bombay And Anr. V/s. The United Motors (India) Ltd. And Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.