SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(P&H) 1465

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Permod Kohli, J.
Jaspal Singh Panch
Versus
State Of Punjab
Civil Writ Petition No. 12339 of 2009,
Decided On : AUGUST 21, 2009

Headnote:(A) Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994, S. 200 and 24--Appointment of administrator of a panchyat--When can be appointed--Default in performance of duties by village panchayat--Sarpanch wrote a letter to District development and Panchayat Officer showing his inability to perform duties of sarpanch on health grounds-­On receipt of DDPO appointed an administrator--Order of Appointment of administrator of panchayat set aside on following grounds--No opportunity provided to rest of the panchayat to perform its duty--If Sarpanch was not able to perform his duties, panches could have elected an other sarpanch--No opportunity of hearing provided before such appointment was made.

       (B) Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994, S.200--Default of duties by panchayat--Panchayat making a default in the performance of its duty--Appointment of administrator of a panchyat--When can be appointed--Default in performance of duties by village panchayat--Sarpanch wrote a letter to District development and Panchayat Officer showing his in ability to perform duties of sarpanch on ilhealth grounds--Before appointing another person to perform such duty, under Section 200 panchayat itself is to be provided such op­portunity of performing its duty--On the failure of the panchayat to do so that resort to the provisions of Section 200 can be made.

       

Judgment

Permod Kohli, J.

1. The appointment of Arbitrator for spending the grants allocated to the Gram Panchayats, is being resorted to indiscriminately sometime without even issuing a Show Cause Notice and for reasons which are not in germane to the provisions of law. Such orders smell extraneous consideration. Keeping in view a large number of such cases coming to this Court for consideration, vide order dated 17.08.2009, the Director, Rural Development and Panchayats, Punjab, was directed to appear in person before this Court. Shri Gurdev Singh Sidhu, Director, Rural Development and Panchayats Punjab, Chandigarh, is present in person. He has been apprised of the situation and asked to take corrective measures in this regard and also to ensure that the provisions of Section 200 are resorted to strictly in accordance with the spirit of law and not for reasons other than the merit and in consonance with principle of natural justice. Mr. Sidhu has assured this Court that necessary corrective/administrative measures will be adopted in this regard. Coming to the facts of the present case, the impugned order dated 04.08.2009 (Annexure P-7), has been passed by the District Development and Panchayat Officer, Amritsar, on the letter of Block Development and Panchayat Officer, Rayya, dated 03.08.2009, to the effect that the coram of the Gram Panchayat, Niranjanpura, is not complete and Sarpanch Tota Singh has written a letter that the Administrator may be appointed to perform the function of the Panchayat and to spend various grants allocated to it. On that basis, the Block Development and Panchayat Officer, Amritsar, allegedly in exercise of powers under Section 200 of the Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), appointed Administrator under Section 200 of the Act. Section 200 of the Act reads as under :-

"200. Default of duties by the Panchayats. (1) Where a Panchayat makes a default in the performance of any duty other than a judicial function imposed upon it by or under this Act or under any other law for the time being in force, (i) in the case of a Gram Panchayat, District Development and Panchayat Officer; and

(ii) in the case of a Panchayat Samiti or a Zila Parishad, the Director; may by an order in writing fix the period, for the performance of the duty and if it is not performed within the period so fixed, he may appoint any other person to perform the duty and direct that the expenses arising from, and incidental to, its performance shall be paid by the Gram Panchayat.

(2) If, in the opinion of the Director a Panchayat has failed or is otherwise incompetent to administer its property, movable or immovable, in the best interests of the Panchayat the Director, after giving an opportunity to the concerned Panchayat of being heard may appoint a person to administer such property for or on behalf of the concerned Panchayat. Provided that the Director may at any time terminate such arrangement and thereupon the administration of the property shall be resumed by the concerned Panchayat.

(3) A person appointed under sub-section (2) shall exercise all such powers of the concerned Panchayat under this Act, other than the judicial powers conferred upon it, or under any other law for the tune being in force, as may be necessary for the management of the property and shall be entitled to receive such remuneration as may be fixed by the Director.

(4) The income from the management of the property referred to in sub- section (2) shall be credited to the fund of the concerned Panchayat and all expenses arising from and incidental to the administration of such property, including the remuneration payable to the person appointed under sub- section (2), shall be met out of the concerned Panchayat Fund.

(5) If the expenses referred to in subsection (1) are not paid- (i) In the case of a Gram Panchayat the District Development and Panchayat Officer, and

(ii) In the case of a Panchayat Samiti or a Zila Parishad, th







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top