M.M.S.BEDI
Parshant Chanana – Appellant
Versus
Seema Alias Priya – Respondent
1. The petitioner has been directed vide order dated 28.01.2009, by the Guardian Judge, Chandigarh, to produce the minor daughter Nitika on every second Saturday for two hours i.e., from 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m., in the Court room in order to enable the respondent to meet the child during pendency of her petition under Sections 17, 25 & 26 of the Guardians and Wards Act, read with Sections 6 & 13 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, regarding custody of the minor child.
2. Feeling aggrieved by the said order of interim visitation rights granted to the respondent-mother of the child, this revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, has been filed by the petitioner. The petitioner had made an attempt to get the order dated 20.01.2009 reviewed by moving an application but vide order dated 31.03.2009, the same has been dismissed. The petitioner has challenged the validity of the said order also.
3. The respondent-mother of minor daughter Nitika has claimed a declaration from the Guardian Judge, Chandigarh, that she is natural guardian of the minor girl Nitika and has prayed for restoration of the minor child, who is under the control and custody of th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.