PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
M.M.S.Bedi, J.
Parshant Chanana
Versus
Seema Alias Priya
C.R. No. 2027 of 2009,
Decided On : JULY 27, 2009
Guardianship - Custody of Minor Child - Guardians and Wards Act, Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act - Sections 17, 25, 26, 6, 13 - Summary of Acts and Sections: The court discussed the provisions of Sections 17, 25, 26 of the Guardians and Wards Act, and Sections 6, 13 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act. The interpretation of Section 9 of the Guardians and Wards Act was crucial in determining the jurisdiction of the court in the matter of guardianship application.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner challenged an order granting interim visitation rights to the respondent-mother of the minor child under Sections 17, 25 & 26 of the Guardians and Wards Act, read with Sections 6 & 13 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act. The respondent claimed to be the natural guardian of the minor girl and sought restoration of custody, alleging mistreatment and illegal snatching of the child by the petitioner.
Finding of the Court:
The court dismissed the revision petition, holding that the Guardian Judge in Chandigarh had jurisdiction to entertain the petition for custody of the minor child, as the child could not be said to be dwelling permanently at Lucknow.
Issues: The key issue was whether the Guardian Judge in Chandigarh had jurisdiction to decide the petition for custody of the minor child, considering the child's residence at Lucknow.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the interpretation of Section 9 of the Guardians and Wards Act, emphasizing that the ordinary place of residence of the minor determines the jurisdiction of the court in guardianship matters. It concluded that the child could not be said to be dwelling permanently at Lucknow, thus affirming the jurisdiction of the Guardian Judge in Chandigarh.
Final Decision: The revision petition was dismissed, affirming the jurisdiction of the Guardian Judge in Chandigarh to entertain the petition for custody of the minor child.
1. The petitioner has been directed vide order dated 28.01.2009, by the Guardian Judge, Chandigarh, to produce the minor daughter Nitika on every second Saturday for two hours i.e., from 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m., in the Court room in order to enable the respondent to meet the child during pendency of her petition under Sections 17, 25 & 26 of the Guardians and Wards Act, read with Sections 6 & 13 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, regarding custody of the minor child.
2. Feeling aggrieved by the said order of interim visitation rights granted to the respondent-mother of the child, this revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, has been filed by the petitioner. The petitioner had made an attempt to get the order dated 20.01.2009 reviewed by moving an application but vide order dated 31.03.2009, the same has been dismissed. The petitioner has challenged the validity of the said order also.
3. The respondent-mother of minor daughter Nitika has claimed a declaration from the Guardian Judge, Chandigarh, that she is natural guardian of the minor girl Nitika and has prayed for restoration of the minor child, who is under the control and custody of the petitioner by moving a petition under Sections 17,25 & 26 of the Guardians and Wards Act, read with Sections 6 & 13 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, claiming that the parties resided together as husband and wife at Chandigarh, in House No. 1433, Sector 34-C, Chandigarh. Out of their wedlock, a female child Nitika was born on 25.11.2000, at Karnal as the respondent had been sent to her parents house three months prior to the date of delivery. Thereafter, the respondent along with petitioner shifted to Mohali, where the petitioner allegedly developed illicit relations with teacher of the child Ms. Bharti, a divorced lady. The petitioner illegally snatched the daughter Nitika from the petitioner without her consent and sent the minor daughter to her sister Radha Malik living at Lucknow, she being issueless. Respondent claims that she had been deprived to impart motherly love and affection towards the minor child. The relations became sore thereafter. The respondent after having been tortured, beaten and abandoned was turned out of matrimonial home on 08.02.2007 when the minor child had already been sent to Lucknow by the petitioner. The respondent is residing with her parents at Karnal. The respondent had also filed a complaint under Sections 406 & 498-A, IPC, before Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karnal. An FIR also stands registered against the petitioner at Karnal. He was arrested by Karnal Police on 01.05.2007 and was released on bail on 03.05.2007. Another petition under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code, is pending in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karnal. The petitioner has also filed a divorce petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, at Ropar, though his residential address has been declared as 1433, Sector 34-C, Chandigarh. The respondent had filed a transfer application in the High Court for transferring the divorce petition from Ropar to Karnal. Vide order dated 08.10.2007, the divorce petition pending at Ropar was transferred to Karnal. As the child had been snatched from the respondent without her consent and permission and sent to Lucknow, it has been claimed that it is in the welfare of the child that her custody be handed over to the respondent-mother who is natural guardian. She has also undertaken that petitioner can have the visitation rights with the minor child.
4. In reply filed to the petition for custody and interim visitation rights, the petitioner strongly challenged the territorial jurisdiction of the Guardian Judge, at Chandigarh, to entertain and decide the petition as the same was hit by Section 9 of the Guardians and Wards Act (for short the Act). It was claimed that the minor child Nitika ordinarily resides at Lucknow and is staying in Class III of Study Hall School, Vipul Khand II,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.