SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(P&H) 1240

M.M.S.BEDI
Parshant Chanana – Appellant
Versus
Seema Alias Priya – Respondent


Judgment

1. The petitioner has been directed vide order dated 28.01.2009, by the Guardian Judge, Chandigarh, to produce the minor daughter Nitika on every second Saturday for two hours i.e., from 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m., in the Court room in order to enable the respondent to meet the child during pendency of her petition under Sections 17, 25 & 26 of the Guardians and Wards Act, read with Sections 6 & 13 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, regarding custody of the minor child.

2. Feeling aggrieved by the said order of interim visitation rights granted to the respondent-mother of the child, this revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, has been filed by the petitioner. The petitioner had made an attempt to get the order dated 20.01.2009 reviewed by moving an application but vide order dated 31.03.2009, the same has been dismissed. The petitioner has challenged the validity of the said order also.

3. The respondent-mother of minor daughter Nitika has claimed a declaration from the Guardian Judge, Chandigarh, that she is natural guardian of the minor girl Nitika and has prayed for restoration of the minor child, who is under the control and custody of th

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top