SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(P&H) 928

MAHESH GROVER
Amar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Amarjit Singh – Respondent


Judgment

1. C. M. No.10055-C of 2002 in view of the fact that C. M. No.10053-C of 2002 filed for condonation of delay of two days in making deficiency of court fee good stands allowed vide order dated 14.12.2002, this application is accepted and delay of two days in the filing of the appeal is condoned. R. S. A. No.4392 of 2002.

2. This Regular Second Appeal is directed against judgments and decrees dated 30.11.2000 and 10.6.2002 passed respectively by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), patiala (hereinafter described as the trial court) and the Additional District Judge, patiala (referred to hereinafter as the First appellate Court) vide which the suit and the appeal of the plaintiffs-appellants were dismissed.

3. The appellants had filed a suit for possession by way of specific performance of the agreements to sell dated 19.5.1989 and 30.4.1991 pertaining to House No.204-A, street No.1, Dashmesh Nagar, Patiala (for short, the suit property ). It was averred that defendants-respondent Nos.1 to 3, being owners, offered to sell the suit property to mohinder Singh son of Atma Singh for a sum of Rs.1,27,000.00 and entered into an agreement on 19.5.1989. The said agreement was signed by

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top