SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(P&H) 829

A.N.JINDAL
Renu Bansal – Appellant
Versus
U. T. Chandigarh – Respondent


Judgment

1. This judgment shall dispose of three connected criminal revision petitions bearing No.1802 of 2001 filed by Rekha; no.1803 of 2001 filed by Deepak Chauhan and No.1804 of 2001 filed by Renu Bansal, all accused petitioners (herein referred as petitioners) having arisen out of the judgment dated 24-11-2001 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Chandigarh.

2. All the three petitioners were convicted under Sections 4.5 and 6 of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 , (herein referred as the Act) vide judgment dated 18-12-1997 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chandigarh and sentenced as under :-

Renu Bansal and Rekha under S.8 of the Act : To undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months and to pay fine of Rs.250/- each. Deepak Chauhan under S.4 of the Act : To undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years and to pay fine of Rs.1000/-. under S.5 of the Act : To undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years and to pay fine of Rs.2.000/-.

3 However, accused Puja Chauhan was acquitted of the charges framed against her.

4. Their appeals were dismissed vide judgment dated 21-11-2001 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, chandigarh.

5. The brief r




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top