SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(P&H) 725

S.D.ANAND
Neelam – Appellant
Versus
Om Parkash – Respondent


Judgment

S.D.Anand, J.

1. The petition filed by the respondent-husband under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act was allowed by the learned District Judge, Narnaul, vide judgment and decree dated 7.3.2006. The appellant-wife filed an appeal against it.

2. In appeal, this Court (vide order dated 30.10.2006) directed that the respondent-husband shall pay (to the appellant wife) a sum of Rs.1500/- per month towards maintenance pendent elite with effect from the date of the filing of the application and also pay a sum of Rs.7500/- towards litigation expenses. The amount aforementioned was ordered to be paid within one month from the date of order passed by this Court. However, the order was not complied with. Thereafter, the wife filed an application for Enhancement of the maintenance pendente lite and also for a direction to the respondent-husband to pay the litigation expenses and the arrears of maintenance pendente lite. The filing of that application was notified to the learned counsel for the respondent.The learned counsel, who appeared on behalf of the respondent, sought time to have instructions about whether the arrears of maintenance pendente lite had been paid or not. On that






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top