SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(P&H) 676

SHAM SUNDER
Narinder Kumar Son Of Om Parkash, Son Of Kundari Lal, Patwari Halqa Sohana, Resident Of Kurali, Tehsil Kharar, District Ropar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Judgment

Sham Sunder, J.

1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction, and the order of sentence dated 10.07.1996, rendered by the Special Judge, Rup Nagar, vide which he convicted Narinder Kumar son of Om Parkash, accused, (now appellant), as under:-

Names of the accused (now appellant)

The offence for which conviction was recorded.

Sentence awarded


Narinder Kumar

U/S.7 read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act.

Rigorous imprisonment for four years. Fine of Rs. 5000/-. In default of payment of fine to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months.


2. The facts, in brief, are that, on 21.08.1991, Narinder Kumar son of Gurcharan Dass, resident of Sohana, Tehsil Kharar, District Rupnagar, came to the office of the Vigilance Flying Squad- I, Punjab, Chandigarh and made his statement Ex.PD, which was recorded by Harjap Singh, Inspector. It was stated, in this statement, by Narinder Kumar, that he was an agriculturist by profession. About two months prior to 21.08.1991, he purchased 8 kanals of land from Kabal Singh son of Dasondi Singh, resident of Sohana, for a consideration of Rs. 80,000/-. The sale deed was registered on 12.06.1991 in tehsil office a


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top