SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(P&H) 379

JASWANT SINGH
Krishan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Rajmal – Respondent


Judgment

Jaswant Singh, J.

1. Petitioner-plaintiff, by filing the present revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, has prayed for setting aside orders dated 17.9.2008 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Hisar whereby his application under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC for amendment of the plaint has been dismissed.

2. The facts are that the petitioner-plaintiff filed a suit on 6.11.2006 for mandatory injunction seeking direction to the respondents-defendants to fill up the earth in the trench, which was dug up by them near/adjacent to the northern wall of the house of the plaintiff and further for permanent injunction restraining them not to dig any khai or to cause damage to the foundation of the house of the plaintiff, in any manner. Along with the suit, an injunction application under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC was also filed. Defendants-respondents appeared and contested the suit. The interim injunction application of the petitioner-plaintiff was dismissed and appeal filed against the same was allowed by the learned Appellate Court. In pursuance of the directions of the learned Appellate Court, it is stated that the respondents- defendants have fill









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top