SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(P&H) 416

K.KANNAN
Om Parkash – Appellant
Versus
Ishwar Singh – Respondent


Judgment

K.Kannan, J.

1. In an election petition before the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Sirsa filed under the relevant provisions of the Panchayati Raj Act, the Court passed an order directing recounting of votes, having due regard to the fact that the elected candidate had won on a margin of two votes and the counter allegations regarding that character of votes polled in the name of respective parties. In particular, the contention of the petitioner assailing the result was that 53 votes which were cast in his favour had been wrongly not counted and 18 which were invalid had been counted valid in favour of the respondent. The contention of the petitioner also was that immediately after the voting was complete by the Returning Officer, the petitioner had given a petition and sought for recounting of votes as provided under Rule 6.9 of Haryana Panchayati Raj Election Rules, 1994. The Election Officer in his evidence however denied the receipt of any such request for recounting and consequently, the copy of the requisition allegedly made by the petitioner before the Court below was not accepted, although it was assigned Mark-A before the trial Court.

2. Learned counsel



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top