SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(P&H) 190

K.C.PURI
Sewa Ram – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Judgment

1. The appellants impugn the validity of their conviction at the hands of trial Judge on a charge under Sec.304-B/34 IPC, vide judgment dated 5-3-2003. Vide separate order dated 6-3-2003, they were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years each and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/- each and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for two months each. However, accused Balwinder Singh was given the benefit of doubt and was acquitted.

2. The necessary facts as adumbrated in the impugned judgment are that Chuni Lal, father of Paramjit Kaur, deceased reported to the police of Police Station Dhariwal on 15-3-1999 that his daughter Paramjit Kaur was married with accused Rajinder Pal about one and half year prior to 15-3-1999. About two months prior to the incident, a female child was born to Paramjit Kaur at his house because Rajinder Pal, his son-in-law has already left Paramjit Kaur in her parental house. Thereafter Rajinder Pal took his wife paramjit Kaur to his village. On 14-3-1999, he received a telephonic message that paramjit Kaur had succumbed to fire injuries in her in-laws house. He reached village babri Nangal in a shocked sta












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top