SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(P&H) 1834

HARBANS LAL
Rulda Singh – Appellant
Versus
Amarvir Kaur – Respondent


Judgment

Harbans Lal, J.

1. This appeal is directed by Rulda Singh, Amar Singh and Surjit Singh against the award dated 13.10.2006 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Fatehgarh Sahib, vide which the present appellants were held liable for payment of compensation to the tune of Rs. 6,02,200 jointly and severally. Feeling aggrieved therewith, the appellants have preferred this appeal.

2. The facts are these: On 11.1.2003 at about 6.30 p.m., Netar Singh and Chamkaur Singh were proceeding from Amloh towards village Warraichan on a scooter bearing registration No. PB 48-3002 driven by Netar Singh. Chamkaur Singh was sitting on the pillion seat. When they neared village Noorpura near Amloh, meanwhile a tractor bearing registration No. PBD 1503 of which one light was on being driven by Rulda Singh came from the opposite direction in a rash and negligent manner. Netar Singh slowed down the speed and stopped the scooter on his own side on seeing the tractor coming on the wrong side. The tractor struck against the scooter. As a result of its impact, the driver as well as the pillion rider of the scooter sustained injuries. The injured persons were removed to the hospital. Netar Sin










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top