SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(P&H) 634

N.K.SUD, BINOD KUMAR ROY, HARJIT SINGH BEDI
Shiv Charan – Appellant
Versus
Financial Commissioner, Revenue Department – Respondent


Judgment

H.S.Bedi, J.

1. This reference to the Full Bench has been necessitated on account of an order made by N.K.Sud, J. on 10.9.2001.

2. The matter arises out of the following facts:-

The petitioner, Shiv Charan, filed a suit Under Section 77(3)(d) of the Punjab Tenancy Act, 1887 (hereinafter called the Act) against respondent No.5 Sham Lal in the Court of the Assistant Collector, Ballabgarh claiming the status of an occupancy tenant Under Sections 5 & 8 thereof. The Assistant Collector dismissed the suit vide his order dated 27.10.1989 (Annexure P-l to the petition). The appeal filed by the petitioner before the Collector, Faridabad was, however, allowed by order dated(Annexure P-2) and it was held mat he was an occupancy tenant on the land in question. Respondent No.5 thereupon filed as appeal against the order (Annexure P-2) before the Commissioner Gurgaon circle, which was dismissed onvide order Annexure P-3. He thereafter filed a revision petition before the Financial Commissioner, pleading for the first time mat a suit for declaration of occupancy rights lay in a civil and not in a Revenue Court after fee promulgation of the Punjab Occupancy Tenants (Vesting of Proprietary


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top