SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(P&H) 655

HEMANT GUPTA
Gulzara Singh – Appellant
Versus
Devinder Singh – Respondent


Judgment

Hemant Gupta, J.

1. The plaintiff-respondents have moved the present application under Sections 152 and 153 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure for correcting typographical error or accidental slip in the decree passed by the trial Court on 18.9.1990 affirmed by the learned District Judge on 5.2.1993 and by this Court in second appeal on 7.10.1993.

2. It has been alleged that the applicant-plaintiffs have filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 12.9.1987 and the sale deed dated 22.9.1987 executed by defendant Surinder Singh. The suit was filed with regard to the land measuring 18 Kanals 18 marlas being 488/128th share of defendant No. 1 in the total land measuring 51 Kanals 8 marlas. The disputed khasra number was described in the suit as 21/1 (9-9) as per jamabandi for the year 1984-85. In agreement to sell dated 12.9.1987 the details of khasra number was not mentioned though khata No. 183/288 was mentioned with the total area of the land measuring 51 kanals 8 marlas.

3. It has further been pointed out that as per Jamabandi for the year 1984-85 produced before the trial court there is no khasra No. 21/1 (9-9) or Khata No. 182/26






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top