SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(P&H) 588

S.S.NIJJAR
Robin Kaushik – Appellant
Versus
Union Public Service Commission Etc. – Respondent


Judgment

S.S.Nijjar, J.

1. This writ petition was admitted on 27.5.2003. The petitioner had made an application seeking permission to amend the writ petition under Order 6 Rule 17 of the CPC. When the matter came up for hearing it was prayed that the application for amendment be dismissed as withdrawn as the petitioner will confine his claim in this writ petition to his eligibility only for the post under contention. The request of the counsel for the petitioner was not opposed. Application for amendment was dismissed as withdrawn. The writ petition was admitted. During the pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner moved C.M. No.3687 of 2004 for disposal of the writ petition in terms of the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of this Court on 24.7.2002 in L.P.A. No.2854 of 2001 (Medical Council of India v. Dr. Sukhwinder Singh Gill and another). This application came up for hearing on 19.3.2004 and the following order was passed:-

"Present:-

Mr. R.S. Mittal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sudhir Mittal, Mr. Namit Kumar and Mr. M.S. Guglani, Learned counsel for the respondent states that the controversy raised in the present writ petition is pending final adjudication in the Honble Supr









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top