SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(P&H) 559

M.M.KUMAR
Sohan Lal – Appellant
Versus
Uttam Singh – Respondent


Judgment

M.M.Kumar, J.

1. This petition filed under section 18-A (8) of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (for brevity the Act) prays for quashing order dated 15.3.2002 passed by the Rent Controller, Jalandhar. The Rent Controller has dismissed the petition filed by the landlord-petitioner under Section 13-A of the Act being a specified landlord within the meaning of Section 2(hh). The landlord-petitioner has filed the ejectment petition on 17.9.1997 claiming that he was a specified landlord being a retiree from, the Punjab State Electricity Board (for brevity the Board). It was asserted that he had retired on 31.12.1996. It was further pleaded that he did not own and possess any suitable accommodation for the residential purpose within the limits of Municipal Corporation, Jalandhar and he intended to reside at 86-B, Guru Nagar, Jalandhar. The demised premises has been on rent with the tenant-respondent. The landlord-petitioner prayed for his eviction on the ground of personal bonafide necessity. It was further asserted that there is one room and one kitchen in house No. 86-B, Guru Nagar, Jalandhar, which is on rent with another tenant namely Gurnam Singh. The family






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top