SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(P&H) 568

M.M.KUMAR
Madan Lal – Appellant
Versus
Baldev Raj – Respondent


Judgment

M.M.Kumar, J.

1. This is tenants petition filed under Section 15(5) of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (for brevity, the Act) challenging concurrent findings of facts recorded by both the Courts below holding that the tenant-petitioners have failed to make payment of rent as assessed by the Rent Controller vide his order dated 5.5.2003 and consequently their ejectment was ordered. Both the Courts have found that the tenants were liable to pay rent from 1.1.1993 till the date of assessment order i.e. 5.5.2003. The observations made by the Supreme Court in Rakesh Wadhawan and Ors. v. Jagdamba Industrial Corporation and Ors., (2002-2)131 P.L.R. 370 (S.C.) have been followed because the tenant-petitioners have failed to comply with the provisional order of assessment dated 5.5.2003.

2. Brief facts of the case necessary for disposal of the instant petition are that the landlord-respondent filed an ejectment petition on 28.11.2002 under Section 13 of the Act seeking ejectment of the tenant-petitioners inter alia on the ground that the tenant-petitioners had taken the demised premises on rent on 1.8.1993 on an agreed rate of Rs. 600/- p.m. along with house tax at


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top