SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(P&H) 378

V.M.JAIN
Santosh Kumari – Appellant
Versus
Harish Kumar – Respondent


Judgment

V.M.Jain, J.

1. This appeal has been filed by the wife against the judgment and decree dated 4.1.1995 passed by the Additional District Judge, Sirsa, whereby the petition filed by the husband seeking the declaration about the marriage between the parties as a nullity was allowed and the marriage was declared null and void.

2. The facts in brief are that Harish Kumar husband had filed a petition under Section 11 read with Section 5(i) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter to be referred as the Act) against his wife Smt. Santesh Kumari as respondent No. 1, and one Subhash as respondent No. 2 seeking a decree for declaring the marriage between them as a nullity. In the said petition, it was alleged by the husband that the marriage was solemnised on 28.1.1993 and that after the marriage, they lived together as husband and wife and cohabited but no child was born out of this wedlock. It was alleged that on the date of solemnisation of the said marriage, Smt. Santosh Kumari (wife) had a living spouse, inasmuch as respondent No. 2 Subhash was still alive and the marriage between them had not been dissolved in any manner and this fact was admitted by her in the civil suit de












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top