SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(P&H) 264

M.M.KUMAR
Gurcharan Singh And Another – Appellant
Versus
Gurudwara Shri Singh Sabha (Regd. ) – Respondent


Judgment

1. This petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Sec. 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for brevity the Code) prays for setting aside order dated 23-2-2004 passed by the Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Chandigarh in Execution Application No. 98 of 13-8-2003. The executing Court has directed that in order to execute the decree for mandatory injunction where direction for vacating the demised premises has been issued, the issuance of warrant of possession would be appropriate course. The decree dated 4-8-2003 passed by the Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Chandigarh is sought to be executed by the DH-respondent.

2. It is pertinent to mention that the defendant respondent filed Civil Suit No. 23 dated 16-8-2003 for mandatory injunction directing the respondents (JD petitioner herein) to vacate and handover the vacant possession of Room No. 7 (two rooms set) situated at Serai attached to the Gurudwara and for the recovery of Rs. 84,200/- as liquidated damages w.e.f. 15-6-1999 to 15-8-2000 @ Rs. 6000/- per month for the unauthorised use and occupation of Room No. 7 and for future damages @ Rs. 6000/- per month from the date of filing of the suit til

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top