SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(P&H) 105

S.S.SARON
Capital Leasing And Finance Co. – Appellant
Versus
Navrattan Jain – Respondent


Judgment

S.S.Saron, J.

1. The complainant-appellant M/s. Capital Leasing and Finance Company Ltd. in this appeal has assailed the order dated 3.2.1998 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Chandigarh, whereby the complaint of the appellant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1882 (`N.I. Act for short) has been dismissed and the respondent acquitted.

2. The complainant-appellant M/s. Capital Leasing and Finance Company filed a complaint under Section 138 N.I. Act against the respondent on the allegations that the complainant is a partnership firm having its registered office at Chandigarh and A.S. Bindra in its partner who has been duly authorised to file the complaint. It is stated that the respondent issued a cheque dated 13.1.1993 for an amount of Rs. 1.00 lac drawn on the New Bank of India, Sector 26-D, Chandigarh to the complainant towards repayment/discharge of his debt liability towards the appellant-firm. The said cheque was duly presented to the bankers of the respondent by the complainant (appellant) through their bank but was returned back unpaid with the endorsement of "Insufficient Funds" by the Bankers of the respondent. After the cheque

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top