SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(P&H) 1664

ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
Harjinder Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Jagjit Singh – Respondent


Judgment

Adarsh Kumar Goel, J.

1. The appellant-plaintiff filed suit for possession alleging that a decree was passed in her favour on 10,4,1972 in Suit No. 227/A by Sub Judge, Ist Class, Rajpura but defendants (who are half-blood brothers of the plaintiff) wanted to take forcible possession of the suit land from her even though, temporary injunction was granted in her favour by the trial court and the lower appellate court but the High Court had ordered status quo, on account of which the defendants dispossessed the plaintiff, which should be restored to her.

2. Case of the plaintiff is that the dispute was about the estate of Jaswant Singh, father of the parties-plaintiffs being daughters from Dalip Kaur and defendants being sons from Kartar Kaur. Jaswant Singh died on 15.6.1952. While half share of the property was mutated in favour of Dalip Kaur and the other half was mutated in favour of minor sons of Kartar Kaur. There was a compromise on which 200 bighas and 1 biswa of land was given to Dalip Kaur for maintenance for life and a sum of Rs. 5000/- was given to her for marriage of her two daughters. This was recorded in order dated 19.6.1954, Ex. P.1 passed by Financial Commissi



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top