SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(P&H) 1659

S.S.NIJJAR
Amar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

S.S.Nijjar, J.

1. The petitioners have filed this writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for the issue of a writ in the nature of Ceitiorari quashing the order, Annexure P1 passed by the Tehsildar (Sales) and the order, Annexure P4 passed by the Joint Secretary (Rehabilitation)-cum-Settlement Commissioner dated 23.5.1983 dismissing the revision filed by the petitioners. The revision petition was stated to have been field on behalf of Maman Singh, Amar Singh, Umrao and Kurara Ram. The crucial point for determination as formulated by the Joint Secretary was whether the order passed by the Tehsildar (Sales) concerning sale of Killa No. 83/22/22 min and 23 min held on 13.1.1972 and confirmed by S.O. (Sales) on 8.2.1962 should be upheld or it should be set aside.

2. It was argued by the counsel for the respondents that the point had already been decided by the Joint Secretary in case No. 7/Appeal/DSR/SC/82/48/Revision/JSR/SC/82. It was argued by the learned counsel for the respondents that the point involved in the aforesaid case was the same which was the subject matter of the revision petition which has been decided by Order, Annexure P4. It was, how




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top