SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(P&H) 1313

G.S.SINGHVI, S.S.SARON
Raghbir – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

G.S.Singhvi, J.

1. In this petition the petitioners have prayed for quashing notice dated 2.12.2002 (Annexure PI) issued by Sub Registrar-II (respondent No. 3) for recovery of the deficient stamp duty of Rs. 46,880/- in respect of sale deed Nos. 471 dated 3.5.1995, 800 dated 20.6.1996 and 899 dated 29.6.1995.

2. A perusal of the record shows that the petitioners and their father-Shri Chandgi Ram purchased land measuring 39 Kanals 8 Marias comprised in Khewat No. 218, Khatoni Nos. 218, 242, 243, 143/1, 244, Rect. No. 30, Killa Nos. 2(8-0), 3(8-0), 4(8-0), 5(8-0) and Rect. No. 31 Killa No. 1(7-8) from Smt. Saroj Bala wife of Shri Krishan Lal vide registered sale deed No. 471 dated 30.5.1995 for a total consideration of Rs. 1,98,000/-by paying stamp duty of Rs. 24,750/-. They purchased another parcel of land measuring 23 Kanals 18 Marias comprised in Khewat No. 219, Khatoni Nos. 241 and 243, Rect. No. 15, Killa Nos. l2(2-7), 14(3-7), 15(4-16), 16/2(5-12), 18(7-10), 17(8-0), 19(8-0), 22(8-0), 23(8-0),24(8-0), 25(8-0) and Rect. No. 14, Killa No. 21(7-8), measuring 79 Kanals (Rakba Moza Nidani) form Smt. Saroj Bala, vide sale deed No. 800 dated 20.6.1995 which was got registered










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top