V.K.BALI
Dayal Chand – Appellant
Versus
Chandi – Respondent
V.K.Bali, J.
1. This revision has been filed by the tenants, who suffered an order of eviction in the proceedings launched against him under Section 13 of the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) vide order dated 4.11.1985 passed by the Rent Controller, Palwal and which order has since been confirmed by the appellate authority in an appeal preferred by him vide judgment dated 14.5.1986.
2. Concededly, eviction of the petitioner has been ordered on the ground that petitioner has ceased to occupy the demised premises for a continuous period of four months, which, concededly, is one of the grounds specified to seek eviction of the tenant under the provisions of the Act.
3. Learned counsel after reading paragraphs 8, 9 and 40 of the order passed by learned Appellate Authority, vehemently, contends that the order of eviction has been passed on the solitary ground that the petitioner herein had not paid electricity bill or that there was no consumption of electricity for continuous period of four months and that it cannot in itself be made basis itself for eviction as held by this Court in Sohan Lal and Anr. v. Gurbachan Sing
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.