SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(P&H) 1344

SWATANTER KUMAR, VINEY MITTAL
Sucha Singh Langah – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Judgment

Swatanter Kumar, J.

1. In all these writ petitions, challenge is to the notification dated 5.7.2002 (Annexure P6 to the writ petitions) vide which the earlier notification dated 12.1.1999 has been rescinded and earlier Judicial Commission has been ordered to be restored. Prayer in the writ petitions itself was made for interim stay of this notification, which was not granted by the Court. However, during the pendency of the writ petitions miscellaneous applications for stay of the interim orders passed by the Judicial Commission functioning under the impugned notifications were also placed on record and by means of the interim application, challenge to the said orders which restrained the present petitioners from functioning as members of the Shiromani Gurdawara Prabhandhak Committee, Amritsar, hereinafter referred to as S.G.P.C., was raised.

2. By this judgment we propose to deal with and dispose of above mentioned ten writ petitions as they involve common question of law based on similar facts. However, for the purposes of clarity and brevity, we are referring to the facts of the case of Sucha Singh Langah v. State of Punjab and Ors., C.W.P. No. 17853 of 2002.

3. Petition











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top