SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(P&H) 1290

HARJIT SINGH BEDI, SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
V. P. Prasher – Appellant
Versus
Haryana Urban Development Authority – Respondent


Judgment

Satish Kumar Mittal, J.

1. On 18.2.1998, the petitioner applied for a plot measuring 10m arlas in Sector 2, Faridabad and deposited 10% amount as earnest money in terms of the advertisement and brochure issued by the Haryana Urban Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as the HUDA). The petitioner was allotted plot bearing No. 2382 in Sector 2, Faridabad vide allotment letter dated 18.11.1998 (Annexure P-3). The tentative price of the said plot was fixed at Rs. 5.50 lacs. On receipt of the said allotment letter, the petitioner paid Rs. 82,500/- being 15% amount of the tentative price on 17.12.1998. Thus petitioner paid 25% amount. As per the aforesaid allotment letter, the remaining 75% amount was to be paid by the petitioner in lump sum without interest within 60 days from the date of the allotment letter or in six annual instalments. According to Clause 7 of the allotment letter, possession of the plot was to be offered to the petitioner on completion of development work in the area. The petitioner paid first instalment of Rs. 68,750/- on 2.12.1999 and the second instalment of the same amount on 18.12.2000. The respondents were required to develop the area immedia






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top