SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(P&H) 1137

S.S.SARON
Mathra Dass – Appellant
Versus
Sarup Chand – Respondent


Judgment

S.S.Saron, J.

1. The landlord-Mathura Dass in this revision petition under Section 15(5) of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) assails the orders dated 18.1.1988 passed by the Appellate Authority under the Act and the order dated 21.5.1986 passed by the Rent Controller, Barnala.

2. The petitioner-Mathura Dass filed a petition under Section 13 of the Act for the ejectment of Sarup Chand and Ishar Singh respondent No. 1 and 2 from the one room shop situated within the Municipal limits of Barnala, as detailed in the head note of the petition. The case of the petitioner is that the shop in dispute was taken on rent by Sarup Chand (respondent No. 1) at the rate of Rs. 70/ per month from 1.8.1976 to 30.7.1977. A rent note dated 21.7,1997 Ex.A1 was executed by Sarup Chand (respondent No. 1). The petitioner sought ejectment of the respondent No. 1 and 2 on the ground of non-payment of rent as respondent No. 1 had not paid rent from 1.7.1976 to 31.5.1984 amounting to Rs. 5040/-. Besides, he had also not paid house tax @ Rs. 45/-p.a. for the period 1978-79 to 1984-85 amounting to Rs. 315/-. The petitioner also prayed that he was enti



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top