SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(P&H) 1029

HEMANT GUPTA
Ilam Chand – Appellant
Versus
Ved Parkash – Respondent


Judgment

1. Defendants Nos. 1 to 3 are in second appeal against the decree for possession passed by the Courts below in favour of the plaintiff-respondent herein.

2. The brief facts out of which the present appeal arise are that one Birbal s/o Siri Ram Sold agricultural land on 23-5-1953. The said sale was disputed by the plaintiff in a reversionary suit by filing a suit for declaration to the effect that the alienation made by his father shall not bind the reversioners of the vendor after his death. This suit was decreed on 12-11-1954. The appeal filed by Ram Sarup s/o Kadma vendee was dismissed on 24-12-1955.

3. Birbal son of Siri Ram, father of the plaintiff, died on 26-9-1991 and, thus, the right to claim possession arose to the reversioners on the basis of judgment and decree dated 12-11-1954. On 4-12-1991, the plaintiff, one of the reversioners, filed a suit for possession on the ground that the alienation made by his father on 23-5-1953 has been held to be not binding on the rights of the plaintiff and, thus, the plaintiff is entitled to possession of the suit land.

4. Defendants Nos. 1 to 5 are sons and daughters of Birbal s/o Lal Mann and defendants Nos. 6 and 7 are sons of














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top