HEMANT GUPTA
Ilam Chand – Appellant
Versus
Ved Parkash – Respondent
1. Defendants Nos. 1 to 3 are in second appeal against the decree for possession passed by the Courts below in favour of the plaintiff-respondent herein.
2. The brief facts out of which the present appeal arise are that one Birbal s/o Siri Ram Sold agricultural land on 23-5-1953. The said sale was disputed by the plaintiff in a reversionary suit by filing a suit for declaration to the effect that the alienation made by his father shall not bind the reversioners of the vendor after his death. This suit was decreed on 12-11-1954. The appeal filed by Ram Sarup s/o Kadma vendee was dismissed on 24-12-1955.
3. Birbal son of Siri Ram, father of the plaintiff, died on 26-9-1991 and, thus, the right to claim possession arose to the reversioners on the basis of judgment and decree dated 12-11-1954. On 4-12-1991, the plaintiff, one of the reversioners, filed a suit for possession on the ground that the alienation made by his father on 23-5-1953 has been held to be not binding on the rights of the plaintiff and, thus, the plaintiff is entitled to possession of the suit land.
4. Defendants Nos. 1 to 5 are sons and daughters of Birbal s/o Lal Mann and defendants Nos. 6 and 7 are sons of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.