VINEY MITTAL
Om Pati – Appellant
Versus
Rajbir – Respondent
1. The present appeal has been filed by Shrimati Om Pati-appellant challenging the judgment dated December 23, 2000 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Hisar whereby the marriage between the parties, namely, the present appellanl-Om Pati and respondent-Rajbir has been ordered to be dissolved by a decree of divorce.
2. A petition under Sec. 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act had been filed by respondent-Rajbir for dissolution of their marriage. It was stated in the petition that parties were married on May 12, 1987 and the Muklawa ceremony was performed after one year of the marriage. The parties cohabited and lived together and out of the wed-lock, a daughter, namely. Sonia was born. The husband claimed that the wife was an arrogant lady and had short temperaments and right from the inception of the marriage, she started hating the husband. She refused to perform the house hold cores and used to picked up quarrel on petty matters and insulted the husband in the presence of his relative and friends. She even used to hurl filthy abuses upon the husband. The husband claimed that she used to go to the extent of levelling false and frivolous allegations against the husban
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.