J.S.NARANG
Sanjeev Kumar Sood – Appellant
Versus
Inderjeet Dhiman – Respondent
J.S.Narang, J.
1. The facts averred and noticed are that petitioner respondent i.e, Inderjeet Dhiman son of late Sh. Amar Chand Dhiman, is the owner and landlord of the factory existing at plot No. 518, Industrial Area, Phase-II, Chandigarh, out of which a room has been let out to the respondent-petitioner i.e. Sanjeev Kumar Sood son of Harbilas Sood, proprietor M/s Sood Packers and Printers and that the said room was to be used as office of the aforesaid proprietary firm. The said room has been marked as ABCD in the map of the factory which has been attached with the petition. The tenant had been created at the rate of Rs. 500/- month plus electricity and water charges and that a rent deed was also executed in respect thereto. The landlord has been receiving the rent and has been executing the appropriate receipts in respect thereof. The tenant became a defaulter since September 1, 1989 and apart from that also became liable to pay water and electricity charges as well. It has been specifically mentioned in the rent note that the premises shall be used as an office but the tenant started misusing the same and got installed a printing machine without the consent of the land
Ram Dhan Sharma V/s. Shri Bishan Sarup Mittal, Advocate And Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.