SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Bachna – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
Satish Kumar Mittal, J.
1. This judgment shall dispose of Civil Misc. Application No. 32632 of 2002 as well as the main writ petition.
2. The petitioner have filed the instant writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus declaring the amended provisions of Section 2(g)(4)(b), proviso to Section 13(B) and Section (7) of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Haryana Amendment Act. 1992 (Haryana Act No. 9 of 1992). amendment of which has been made vide notification dated 11.2.1992, as ultra vires and unconstitutional and further to declare that the amended provisions have no adverse effect on the rights of the petitioners and further for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the Assistant Collector. 1st Grade Kuruk-shetra (respondent No. 2) and Gram Panchayat, village Sunarian (respondent No. 3) not to dispossess the petitioners from the land in question.
3. In the petition, the petitioners have averred that they are the residents of village Sunarian. Tehsil Thanesar. Distt. Kurukshetra. During the consolidation of Holdings in village Sunarina, a big chunk of land, including the land i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.