SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(P&H) 529

SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Bachna – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

Satish Kumar Mittal, J.

1. This judgment shall dispose of Civil Misc. Application No. 32632 of 2002 as well as the main writ petition.

2. The petitioner have filed the instant writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus declaring the amended provisions of Section 2(g)(4)(b), proviso to Section 13(B) and Section (7) of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Haryana Amendment Act. 1992 (Haryana Act No. 9 of 1992). amendment of which has been made vide notification dated 11.2.1992, as ultra vires and unconstitutional and further to declare that the amended provisions have no adverse effect on the rights of the petitioners and further for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the Assistant Collector. 1st Grade Kuruk-shetra (respondent No. 2) and Gram Panchayat, village Sunarian (respondent No. 3) not to dispossess the petitioners from the land in question.

3. In the petition, the petitioners have averred that they are the residents of village Sunarian. Tehsil Thanesar. Distt. Kurukshetra. During the consolidation of Holdings in village Sunarina, a big chunk of land, including the land i















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top