SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(P&H) 538

M.M.KUMAR
Yash Pal – Appellant
Versus
Kartar Singh – Respondent


Judgment

1. This petition filed under Sec. 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for brevity the Code) is directed against the order dated 20-2-2003 passed by the Addl. Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Gidderbaha dismissing the applicant of the defendant-petitioner filed under Order 26, Rule 10-A read with Sec. 151 of the Code. The prayer made in the application was that the disputed pronote and receipt 11-2-1998 be sent to Forensic Science Lab. Govt. of N.C.T., Delhi to find out the age of the ink used on the stamps.

2. The plaintiff-respondent has filed a suit against the defendant-petitioner for recovery of Rs. 5,83,400.00 by propounding a pronote and receipt dated 11-2-1998. The defence taken by the defendant-petitioner is the plaintiff-respondent has manipulated the disputed pronote and receipt in his favour by alleging that it was executed on 11-2-1998. The defendant-petitioner has claimed that he had signed the stamps and had given the figure of Rs. 4,70,000.00 on the blank pronote and receipt to one Shri Sushil Kumar Singla of M/s. Singla Trading Company, Sirsa many years before 11-2-1998. The plaintiff-respondent has also examined one Shri Navdeep Gupta, an expert from Patia





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top